Skip to main content

Budget Watches (Chronograph vs Field Watch) - Casio MTP-4500 vs Wenger 72803

Watch Comparison: Casio MTP-4500 vs. Wenger 72803W

I have a fondness for three styles of analog watches: Chronographs, Field Watches, and Divers. Typically, I find that Quartz movements work best for Chronograph complications, while Automatic/Mechanical movements can rival Quartz in Field and Dive Watches. I also like to keep a few budget Quartz watches in my collection as 'beater' watches, allowing me to enjoy some basic styling without the worry of damage.

When I’m not wearing an Automatic/Mechanical, I gravitate towards 'busy' Quartz Chronographs on a metal bracelet, such as the Casio MTP-4500.

Watch Specifications

[Watch #1]

  • Brand/Model: Casio MTP-4500
  • Style: Chronograph (3 Register, Center Seconds)
  • Dimensions: 41mm Case Width, 11mm Case Height, 22mm Lug Width
  • Movement: Quartz
  • Features: Tachymeter Rotating Bezel, No Date, Metal Bracelet
  • Retail Price: $33 @ Amazon (MSRP $80)

[Watch #2]

  • Brand/Model: Wenger 72803W
  • Style: Field Watch
  • Dimensions: 41mm Case Width, 11mm Case Height, 20mm Lug Width
  • Movement: Quartz
  • Features: Date, Leather Band
  • Retail Price: $33 @ Amazon (MSRP $135)

Comparison Breakdown

1. Design

Casio wins.
The Casio features a beautiful 38mm watch face that feels perfectly sized, whereas the Wenger appears larger despite the same case width. The black face of the Casio looks sharp, with polished hour indices that really stand out.

However, the Casio's 22mm lugs feel too large for a 41mm case; 20mm would provide a better proportion. It’s becoming increasingly challenging to find a well-designed 41mm watch case with 20mm lugs. The Casio's metal bracelet is surprisingly comfortable and easy to size, making it ideal for those moments when I need a straightforward Quartz watch.

2. Build Quality

Wenger wins.
The brushed metal case of the Wenger exudes quality, and I’m curious how a Wenger Chronograph would stack up against the Casio. While the Casio is decent and appears solid, its polished surfaces aren’t my favorite, though they are a good compromise for a budget watch.

3. Legibility

Wenger wins.
This was expected since the simpler Field Watch design of the Wenger is easier to read than the busy chronograph dial of the Casio. The Wenger has decent lume on the hour and second hands, making it legible at night. While the Casio also has lume, I haven’t had the chance to charge it fully to evaluate its effectiveness.

Additionally, the date complication on the Wenger is quite handy for me, as I often check the date while filling out forms.

4. Overall

Casio wins.
Though the Wenger is functional and well-crafted, it doesn’t have the same aesthetic appeal on my wrist as the Casio. Wearing the Casio feels like I’m sporting a watch that’s worth more than its price point, while the Wenger gives off a more typical $30 watch vibe. Although value is subjective and both watches serve their intended purpose excellently, I find myself leaning towards the Casio.

If the Casio had 20mm lugs, better lume, and perhaps a simpler bracelet design, it would earn a more decisive victory. Conversely, if the Wenger were more proportionate and featured a better bracelet, it would be a serious contender.

5. Closing

Both watches are great additions to my collection, offering distinct styles and functionalities. I’ve been wearing the Casio for several days now and am very pleased with it. For the Wenger, I’ve tried it on various bands, and so far, the Hirsch Liberty has been a strong choice. Its heavy 4mm thickness helps balance the larger watch face nicely.



Comments

  1. I Want to buy Casio G Shock GAS-100BR-1A, can anyone guide me the perfect online store to buy casio orignal product.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, Thanks for asking about our suggestions to buying your favourite watch, but i will suggest you this website www.casiocentre.com to ordering your favourite watch in Pakistan.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sony MDR-ZX100 vs ZX-110 vs ZX310 Series Headphones

Sony ZX Series Headphones Review: A Budget-Friendly Sound Choice If you’re on the hunt for budget-friendly headphones with decent quality, the Sony ZX Series is definitely worth considering. I happen to own several models from the lineup: ZX-100 ZX-110 ZX-310 Let’s dive into how they compare in terms of build quality, cost, specs, sound, and overall value. Build Quality: ZX-310 Takes the Lead The Sony ZX series headphones primarily feature a durable plastic construction. My ZX-100 has lasted over 2½ years, enduring countless tosses into my backpack and car without any issues. However, the lower-end ZX-100 and ZX-110 models have a significant downside: poor-quality earpads. Over time, these earpads disintegrate, leaving vinyl flakes that stick to your hair and ears. The ZX-310, on the other hand, comes with upgraded earpads that don’t suffer from this problem, making them a clear winner in the build department. Cost Comparison: ZX-100/110 Wins for Affordability While the ZX-310 model co

Casio G-Shock 5600 vs 6900 vs 9000

G-Shock Preferences and Favorites After trying out several G-Shock models, I've developed a better sense of the specific features and design elements I appreciate most. While features are always a plus, my main priority is size . Here's how some of the models I've tried stack up. Size Preference: DW-5600 Series For overall size, the DW-5600 series stands out as a favorite due to its compact, comfortable form. It’s slim, lightweight, and fits well on my wrist without being too bulky. Although the 6900 series provides the benefit of a well-placed front illumination button, the 5600 remains the ideal size for everyday wear. Best Compromise: G9000 Mudman Series If I had to choose a balanced option between size, comfort, and functionality, the G9000 Mudman series would be it. The buttons are slightly tough to press, but the layout and form factor resonate with what I prefer in a G-Shock. Despite having different module versions (GLX, G, and DW), I find that these models offe

Eton Microlink FR160 Radio -- Sticky Residue

Eton Microlink FR160 Handcrank Radio Review I bought an Eton Microlink FR160 handcrank radio for my emergency kit a few years ago, and it’s been great overall. However, there’s one significant issue I've encountered. Sticky Residue Problem Over time, a sticky residue developed on the radio's external surface, which was driving me nuts. At first, I thought there was something wrong with the device. Solution Fortunately, I researched the problem online and discovered that Eton radios are coated with a substance designed to make them easier to grip. Unfortunately, this coating degrades over time and turns into a sticky mess. To resolve the issue, I used isopropyl alcohol and cotton balls to clean most of the gunk. While some paint may have been lost in the process, at least the radio is no longer sticky.