Skip to main content

Apple iPhone 16 - Good, but not amazing

With my new iPhone 16 arriving wanted to prepare a comparison to see how it sizes up vs my 14 Pro.  I’m anticipating a slightly lighter, but faster phone.  Although, I maybe sacrificing a bit on the screen based on initial online reviews.

But being that I was already happy with the LCD display on an iPhone 11.  I should be more than satisfied with the OLED on the 16.

And based on the specs there isn’t much difference between the 14 Pro and standard 16.  My 2 reasons for the 16 is Type-C and lower weight.

Initial Review - 16 is good, not amazing.

Now that I’ve had my 16 for several days I’m satisfied with the form factor, lighter weight and slightly faster specs.

I do miss the better 120 Hz refresh rate of the 14 Pro’s screen, but otherwise for me the base model 16 is a better fit.

As iPhone doesn’t have the best cameras to begin with relative to Samsung’s flagship models, it’s not a real concern to forgo the triple cameras of the Pro series.

At same time after 2 years, having less advanced screen technology on a newer 16 is a bit of a disappointment.  Otherwise, it’s totally fine.  While, I’m appreciative of not having the notch, I’m understanding why people like higher refresh rates.

Samsung has enjoyed fast refresh rates for many years on even their basic A-series phones.

Other than that … this might be the first iPhone in a long while I could confidently carry without a case.

Specs - iPhone 14 Pro

  • 6.1” screen (1179 x 2556 pixels) ~460 ppi - 120 Hz
  • A16 Bionic (4 nm)
  • 6 GB Ram / 128 GB Storage
  • 3200 mAh battery
  • 48 MP / 12 MP / 12 MP camera
  • 7 oz weight
  • Lightning Port

Specs - iPhone 16

  • 6.1” screen (1179 x 2556 pixels) ~460 ppi - 60 Hz
  • A18 Bionic (3 nm)
  • 8 GB Ram / 128 GB Storage
  • 3561 mAh battery
  • 48 MP / 12 MP camera
  • 6 oz weight
  • USB Type-C 2.0



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sony MDR-ZX100 vs ZX-110 vs ZX310 Series Headphones

By happenstance I own several Sony ZX Series Headphones: ZX-100 ZX-110 ZX-310 Build Quality (ZX-310 Wins) They use mostly a Plastic Build that is quite durable; the ZX-100 I've had for over 2 1/2 years and been thrown about in my Backpack & Car.  The ONLY issue with the lower model ZX-100 & ZX-110 Series are the crappy Earpads that disintegrate and create a flaky vinyl mess.  Those flakes then get stuck to your ears & hair.  The ZX-310 wins in that regard with much better quality Earpads. Cost (ZX-100/110 Wins) ZX-310's cost about twice that of the ZX-100/110 and I've been able to find several 310's for about $18 at Discount Retailers.  ZX-110's should go for about $10. Specs They are all 30mm Drivers.  The ZX-310 has a wider Frequency Range of 10 ~ 24,000 Hz and a Gold 1/8" Plug.  The ZX-100/110 are roughly identical going 12 ~ 22,000 Hz. Sound (ZX-100 Wins) Surprisingly, I prefer the ZX-100's Sound Signature vs. the 110 and 31

Casio G-Shock 5600 vs 6900 vs 9000

Having now owned several G-Shocks I've come to appreciate certain features of various models.  For most part all I care about primarily is 'size'.  Features are secondary and so long as it has World Time, I'm happy. Size (5600 wins) In terms of size the 5600's are my favorite, but the convenience of the illumination button front and center on the 6900 is beautiful. The compromise?  It has to go to the 9000 series Mudman.  While the buttons are difficult to press it is the right size and button arrangement that just connects with me as one of my favorite G-Shocks thus far.  Now Module versions this is probably a bad selection to compare as I have a GLX, G and DW types.  But form factor wise they are roughly equivalent representatives of their model series.  There are certainly much larger G-Shocks, but for me the 6900 is where I will draw the line for now. Features (G9000 Wins, GLX5600 Good Second) Most G-Shocks have the standard basics down pat and all I car

Eton Microlink FR160 Radio -- Sticky Residue

I bought an Eton Microlink FR160 Handcrank Radio for my Emergency Kit a few years ago and it's great, except for one thing....over time a sticky residue coats the radio's external surface.  It was driving me nuts and I thought something was wrong. Fortunately, rather than dump it I researched online and learned Eton Radios are coated with a substance to make them easier to grip, but over time it degrades and becomes a sticky mess.  Some isopropyl alcohol and cotton balls can clean most of the gunk.  Some paint maybe lost in the process, but the radio at least is not sticky anymore.