Skip to main content

Victorinox Swiss Army - Alox vs Cellidor

Alox vs. Cellidor: My Experience with Victorinox Swiss Army Knives

Having owned and used both Alox and Cellidor Victorinox Swiss Army knives, I've come to appreciate the unique characteristics of each. These materials define the handles, or scales, of the knives, leading to differences in durability, weight, and aesthetics.

Understanding Alox and Cellidor

Alox

  • Material: Alox stands for Aluminum Oxide, a metal finish that has been used in military-issued Soldier knives for the Swiss Army since the 1960s, continuing until around 2008. Victorinox has also produced civilian versions, such as the Pioneer Alox, which is a near-exact replica of the Soldier with the addition of a keyring.
  • Durability: The metallic scales offer increased resistance to impact and chemicals compared to plastic, making them a robust choice for rugged use.

Cellidor

  • Material: Cellidor refers to the plastic scales used on many Victorinox civilian knife models, most famously recognized by their iconic red color.
  • Durability: While lighter than Alox, Cellidor can be brittle, susceptible to cracking from hard impacts or degrading when exposed to harsh chemicals.

Which is Better?

Ultimately, the choice between Alox and Cellidor depends on your needs and intended use for the knife. Here are some considerations:

  • Durability: Alox knives are generally more resistant to damage due to their metal construction. In contrast, Cellidor can be prone to cracking.
  • Weight: Cellidor is lighter, making it a better option for those who prioritize portability. For example, my 3-layer Climber weighs about the same as a 2-layer Alox Pioneer.
  • Tool Variety: Cellidor models often come with a broader range of tools, providing more options for various tasks.

My Preference for Alox

Personally, I lean towards Alox for several reasons:

  1. Awl Positioning: I prefer the position of the awl on Alox models compared to its location on many Cellidor models. The ergonomics of Alox feel more intuitive for my use.
  2. Aesthetics: The colors on Alox scales tend to be more vibrant, giving them a more premium look and feel. This aesthetic appeal is important to me as a collector and user.
  3. Minimalist Design: Alox knives often embody a simpler, minimalist design, which I appreciate. Among my favorites is the Alox Classic, which I consider one of the most ideal options for a Swiss Army Knife.

Conclusion

Both Alox and Cellidor have their strengths and weaknesses, making them suitable for different users and applications. Whether you choose Alox for its durability and premium feel or Cellidor for its lightweight and variety, both materials deliver the quality and functionality expected from Victorinox. For my use, the Alox has proven to be the better fit, aligning with my preferences for design and usability.



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sony MDR-ZX100 vs ZX-110 vs ZX310 Series Headphones

Sony ZX Series Headphones Review: A Budget-Friendly Sound Choice If you’re on the hunt for budget-friendly headphones with decent quality, the Sony ZX Series is definitely worth considering. I happen to own several models from the lineup: ZX-100 ZX-110 ZX-310 Let’s dive into how they compare in terms of build quality, cost, specs, sound, and overall value. Build Quality: ZX-310 Takes the Lead The Sony ZX series headphones primarily feature a durable plastic construction. My ZX-100 has lasted over 2½ years, enduring countless tosses into my backpack and car without any issues. However, the lower-end ZX-100 and ZX-110 models have a significant downside: poor-quality earpads. Over time, these earpads disintegrate, leaving vinyl flakes that stick to your hair and ears. The ZX-310, on the other hand, comes with upgraded earpads that don’t suffer from this problem, making them a clear winner in the build department. Cost Comparison: ZX-100/110 Wins for Affordability While the ZX-310 model co
9 comments
Read more

Casio G-Shock 5600 vs 6900 vs 9000

G-Shock Preferences and Favorites After trying out several G-Shock models, I've developed a better sense of the specific features and design elements I appreciate most. While features are always a plus, my main priority is size . Here's how some of the models I've tried stack up. Size Preference: DW-5600 Series For overall size, the DW-5600 series stands out as a favorite due to its compact, comfortable form. It’s slim, lightweight, and fits well on my wrist without being too bulky. Although the 6900 series provides the benefit of a well-placed front illumination button, the 5600 remains the ideal size for everyday wear. Best Compromise: G9000 Mudman Series If I had to choose a balanced option between size, comfort, and functionality, the G9000 Mudman series would be it. The buttons are slightly tough to press, but the layout and form factor resonate with what I prefer in a G-Shock. Despite having different module versions (GLX, G, and DW), I find that these models offe
Post a Comment
Read more

Eton Microlink FR160 Radio -- Sticky Residue

Eton Microlink FR160 Handcrank Radio Review I bought an Eton Microlink FR160 handcrank radio for my emergency kit a few years ago, and it’s been great overall. However, there’s one significant issue I've encountered. Sticky Residue Problem Over time, a sticky residue developed on the radio's external surface, which was driving me nuts. At first, I thought there was something wrong with the device. Solution Fortunately, I researched the problem online and discovered that Eton radios are coated with a substance designed to make them easier to grip. Unfortunately, this coating degrades over time and turns into a sticky mess. To resolve the issue, I used isopropyl alcohol and cotton balls to clean most of the gunk. While some paint may have been lost in the process, at least the radio is no longer sticky.
6 comments
Read more